I have been saying
this for years. This idea, universally promoted by an endless rolling sequence of romantic comedies by the same gutless, desperately unimaginative studios, pervades the minds of the young and impressionable with the same story, repeated over and over and over so predictably I've begun to suspect it's a scientific experiment. Change one variable at a time - He's black, she's white; She's black, he's white; He's rich, she's poor; She's rich, he's poor; He's gay, he's gay; She's gay, she's gay; He's an asshole - but keep the rest of the story
so similar to all the others that there's really very little point rewriting the script.
The rules which these films must adhere to are
classic fairytale stuff, but somewhere along the way
the word's meaning changed. It used to mean something unrealistic and unattainable, and this was understood. It was couched in unrealistic terms, to make the truth less biting when it came: you're not a princess, you're a commoner, and no knight knows your name, let alone admires your pockmarked beauty. But something changed. Somewhere along the line the promise of what was unreal became indistinguishable from the promise of the real. Because these unrealistic stories started being told about real people, people who worked day jobs and lived in houses and apartments like the ones their audience lived in. And so it
couldn't be a fairytale. If it were a fairytale, surely this would be a tragedy, a catastrophe of earth-shattering proportions; surely this would be the end of
True Love!
Because it's been
told so often and so formulaically now that the rom-com formula is the only thing a certain proportion of idiots spread across (at least) the last two generations are capable of understanding:
You Will Meet Someone You Hate (But Secretly Fancy)
You Will Spend Time Together And Get To Know Them
You Will Come To Understand That Their Problems Can Be Fixed
You Are The One They Have Been Waiting For To Fix Their Problems
You Must Fix Their Problems
You Commit Eternity To Solving Their Problems
End
When you meet someone you hate, there's usually a good reason. I've had an awe-inspiring display of the power of self-delusion recently, as a close friend clings to the promise of Stage Three, having been made to believe in Stages Four and Five. But the end of the formula comes far too soon, like all happy endings: the end of the formula comes with the promise, not the work. Because the work cannot fill screen-time - at least until Channel 4 decide its latest jaunt into public
schadenfreude will include televised marriage counselling. It's boring, it's repetitive, it's often over nonsencially small things. You know why people in romantic comedies have affairs? Because arguing over the fact that he always puts the football on even when she'd like EastEnders on is boring and trivial. You know why these films end at marriage? Because despite the
horrific statistics, we're still led (by the nose) to believe that marriage should solve all the problems.
The image of love portrayed in these films is of
trumpets blaring, the people in question
just knowing that they have found The One Who Was Destined To Be Theirs, and no further thought being given to the grotesque incompatibilities of personality which appeared as the initial obstacle, and which, in real life, do not go away permanently because you're happy on your wedding day.
I've always phrased the existence of the Hollywood Lie as "There is no One", but this article has made me understand how much more dangerous it is than just that. Anything that prevents people in relationships communicating properly is a divorce sentence. And given how the story ends at the wedding in these films, we don't get to see the aftermath, when she can't fix his problems, but alcohol can; when he can't learn to love her foibles, but Mark from work can.
I'm not saying there's no hope, and I'm not saying there's no chance. I'm saying: use your brains. Of course there's such a thing as True Love, but it's neither effortless nor predestined. If nothing else, the sheer
accidents of history that are our friendship and peer groups should point that out. What I'm saying is that they should never have become a model for what to expect out of a relationship. They're a vile, oversimplified parody, and taking advice from them is like asking Punch and Judy for child-rearing advice.
Just remember, as you watch Ben Stiller walk up the aisle
again, this number: 40%. Because for every five rom-coms you leave feeling elated, two of them missed off an epilogue: the divorce.